Journal article
Niels G. Mede, Lara Kobilke, Nayla Fawzi, Thomas Zerback
Social Media + Society, vol. 11, 2025
Social Media + Society, vol. 11, 2025
Cite
Cite
APA
Click to copy
Mede, N. G., Kobilke, L., Fawzi, N., & Zerback, T. (2025). The climate change generation: Vocal but overconfident? How young adults who overestimate their climate knowledge use social media and engage with others. Social Media + Society, 11. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051251341792
Chicago/Turabian
Click to copy
Mede, Niels G., Lara Kobilke, Nayla Fawzi, and Thomas Zerback. “The Climate Change Generation: Vocal but Overconfident? How Young Adults Who Overestimate Their Climate Knowledge Use Social Media and Engage with Others.” Social Media + Society 11 (2025).
MLA
Click to copy
Mede, Niels G., et al. “The Climate Change Generation: Vocal but Overconfident? How Young Adults Who Overestimate Their Climate Knowledge Use Social Media and Engage with Others.” Social Media + Society, vol. 11, 2025, doi:10.1177/20563051251341792.
BibTeX Click to copy
@article{mede2025a,
title = {The climate change generation: Vocal but overconfident? How young adults who overestimate their climate knowledge use social media and engage with others},
year = {2025},
journal = {Social Media + Society},
volume = {11},
doi = {10.1177/20563051251341792},
author = {Mede, Niels G. and Kobilke, Lara and Fawzi, Nayla and Zerback, Thomas}
}
esearch suggests that social media can cause users, especially young adults, to overestimate their knowledge about climate change. Knowledge overestimation may then lead users to communicate more frequently about climate change with others. We test these hypotheses with a four-wave panel survey of respondents aged 18–29 years. We find that social media exposure is positively associated with respondents’ tendencies to overestimate their knowledge about climate change, but we do not find causal effects. Overestimation is also related to perceived information overload, subjective digital literacy, and trust in social media comments. While overestimation did not cause higher outspokenness about climate change, it increased respondents’ efforts to persuade others and engage with politicians. These results have implications for science communication and education.